Home » Opinion » Foreign Views
India leads China in modern service sector that drives economy
CHINA and India are both racing ahead economically. But the manner in which they are growing is dramatically different.
Whereas China is a formidable exporter of manufactured goods, India has acquired a global reputation for exporting modern services.
Indeed, India has leapfrogged over the manufacturing sector, going straight from agriculture into services.
The differences in the two countries' growth patterns are striking, and raise significant questions for development economists.
Can service be as dynamic as manufacturing?
Can late-comers to development take advantage of the increasing globalization of the service sector?
Can services be a driver of sustained growth, job creation, and poverty reduction?
Some facts are worth examining. The relative size of the service sector in India, given the country's state of development, is much bigger than it is in China.
Despite being a low-income region, India and other South Asian countries have adopted the growth patterns of middle- to high-income countries.
Their growth patterns more closely resemble those of Ireland and Israel than those of China and Malaysia.
Ironic 'iron law'
India's growth pattern is remarkable because it contradicts a seemingly iron law of development that has held true for almost 200 years, since the start of the Industrial Revolution.
According to this "law" - which is now conventional wisdom - industrialization is the only route to rapid economic development for developing countries.
As a result of globalization, the pace of development can be explosive. But the potential for explosive growth has usually been seen only in the manufacturing sector.
This is no longer the case. There is evidence that countries with high growth in services also tend to have high overall economic growth; conversely, countries with high overall economic growth have high services growth.
To be sure, the causal connection remains uncertain: after all, there is also a positive relationship - widely accepted in development economics - between manufacturing growth and overall growth.
But what has been overlooked is that the effect of services growth on aggregate economic growth appears to be as strong, if not stronger, than the effect of manufacturing growth on overall growth.
Moreover, the trend over time to a higher service-sector share in the economy suggests that higher real growth in services has not been offset by price declines.
'Dutch disease'
There is no outbreak of the so-called "Dutch disease" - that is, the price of services do not fall with an increase in the supply.
India has a higher share of services, and more rapid service-sector growth, than China, although the latter is richer and has grown faster over time.
This indicates that services are not simply responding to domestic demand (which would be higher in China), but also to export opportunities.
India's growth experience suggests that a global service revolution - rapid growth and poverty reduction led by services - is now possible.
In India, the service sector has not only led overall economic growth, but is also characterized by higher labor productivity than in the industrial sector.
Indeed, productivity growth in India's service sector matches productivity growth in China's manufacturing sector, thereby reducing poverty by enabling wages to rise. Service-led growth is sustainable, because globalization of services, which account for more than 70 percent of global output, is still in its infancy.
Moreover, the long-held view that services are non-transportable, non-tradable, and non-scalable no longer holds for a host of modern impersonal services, which can now be produced and exported at low cost.
India's experience offers hope to other development late-comers.
(The author is an economic adviser on South Asia at the World Bank. The views are his own. Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2010. www.project-syndicate.org.)
Whereas China is a formidable exporter of manufactured goods, India has acquired a global reputation for exporting modern services.
Indeed, India has leapfrogged over the manufacturing sector, going straight from agriculture into services.
The differences in the two countries' growth patterns are striking, and raise significant questions for development economists.
Can service be as dynamic as manufacturing?
Can late-comers to development take advantage of the increasing globalization of the service sector?
Can services be a driver of sustained growth, job creation, and poverty reduction?
Some facts are worth examining. The relative size of the service sector in India, given the country's state of development, is much bigger than it is in China.
Despite being a low-income region, India and other South Asian countries have adopted the growth patterns of middle- to high-income countries.
Their growth patterns more closely resemble those of Ireland and Israel than those of China and Malaysia.
Ironic 'iron law'
India's growth pattern is remarkable because it contradicts a seemingly iron law of development that has held true for almost 200 years, since the start of the Industrial Revolution.
According to this "law" - which is now conventional wisdom - industrialization is the only route to rapid economic development for developing countries.
As a result of globalization, the pace of development can be explosive. But the potential for explosive growth has usually been seen only in the manufacturing sector.
This is no longer the case. There is evidence that countries with high growth in services also tend to have high overall economic growth; conversely, countries with high overall economic growth have high services growth.
To be sure, the causal connection remains uncertain: after all, there is also a positive relationship - widely accepted in development economics - between manufacturing growth and overall growth.
But what has been overlooked is that the effect of services growth on aggregate economic growth appears to be as strong, if not stronger, than the effect of manufacturing growth on overall growth.
Moreover, the trend over time to a higher service-sector share in the economy suggests that higher real growth in services has not been offset by price declines.
'Dutch disease'
There is no outbreak of the so-called "Dutch disease" - that is, the price of services do not fall with an increase in the supply.
India has a higher share of services, and more rapid service-sector growth, than China, although the latter is richer and has grown faster over time.
This indicates that services are not simply responding to domestic demand (which would be higher in China), but also to export opportunities.
India's growth experience suggests that a global service revolution - rapid growth and poverty reduction led by services - is now possible.
In India, the service sector has not only led overall economic growth, but is also characterized by higher labor productivity than in the industrial sector.
Indeed, productivity growth in India's service sector matches productivity growth in China's manufacturing sector, thereby reducing poverty by enabling wages to rise. Service-led growth is sustainable, because globalization of services, which account for more than 70 percent of global output, is still in its infancy.
Moreover, the long-held view that services are non-transportable, non-tradable, and non-scalable no longer holds for a host of modern impersonal services, which can now be produced and exported at low cost.
India's experience offers hope to other development late-comers.
(The author is an economic adviser on South Asia at the World Bank. The views are his own. Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2010. www.project-syndicate.org.)
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS
- |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 沪ICP证:沪ICP备05050403号-1
- |
- 互联网新闻信息服务许可证:31120180004
- |
- 网络视听许可证:0909346
- |
- 广播电视节目制作许可证:沪字第354号
- |
- 增值电信业务经营许可证:沪B2-20120012
Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.