Home 禄 Opinion 禄 Foreign Views
Magna Carta continues to compel and confound
Print Edition
Fly out of London鈥檚 Heathrow Airport and you may pass over a grassy field called Runnymede. Eight hundred years ago this month, it offered a colorful spectacle, dotted with the tents of barons and knights, and the larger pavilion of King John of England, looking like a circus top with the royal standard fluttering above.
Despite the gathering锘库檚 pageant-like appearance, the atmosphere was undoubtedly tense. The purpose was to settle a conflict between rebellious barons and their king, a ruler described by a contemporary as 锘库渂rimful of evil qualities.锘库
John鈥檚 efforts to raise money to regain lost lands in France exceeded the usual taxes and levies that the nobles had accepted from his predecessors. The king seized the estates, and sometimes the person, of wealthy lords or merchants and demanded hefty payments for their release.
If his years of amassing cash had led to victory, John might have got away with his arbitrary methods; but when he was defeated in France, a group of barons rose up against him and captured London. As part of a peace deal brokered by the Archbishop of Canterbury, the king accepted the baron锘縮鈥 demands, put to him in a document called Magna Carta, or 锘 鈥渢he Great Charter.鈥濓豢
What these fighters for justice and freedom take from this 3,500-word document is the brief statements of general principles in response to John锘库檚 arbitrary seizure of his subjects鈥欙豢 property and person. In its 39th Chapter, Magna Carta states: 锘库淣o free man is to be arrested, or imprisoned, or diseised [dispossessed], or outlawed, or exiled, or in any way destroyed, nor will we go against him, nor will we send against him, save by the lawful judgement of his peers or by the law of the land.锘库 Chapter 40 states, concisely, another powerful principle: 锘库淭o no one will we sell, to no one will we deny or delay, right or justice.鈥
Modern echo
These two chapters have their modern echo in the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution, which decrees that no state shall deprive anyone of life, liberty, or property 鈥渨ithout due process of law鈥濓豢 or deny anyone 鈥渢he equal protection of the laws.鈥濓豢
Yet Magna Carta is not a democratic document. Although it established the requirement of common consent to taxation, that consent was to be obtained from an assembly of earls, barons, bishops, and abbots.
There is nothing in Magna Carta that prevents the enactment and enforcement of unjust laws; but it does elevate the law above the ruler锘库檚 will. Unfortunately, that idea still is not accepted in many countries. Moreover, as the continued existence of the US prison camp at Guant谩namo Bay shows, even among countries that trace their political institutions to Magna Carta, perceived security threats have weakened the requirement that no one be arrested except under the law of the land, and that justice not be delayed.
Peter Singer is Professor of Bioethics at Princeton University and Laureate Professor at the University of Melbourne.
Copyright: Project Syndicate.
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 娌狪CP璇侊細娌狪CP澶05050403鍙-1
- |
- 浜掕仈缃戞柊闂讳俊鎭湇鍔¤鍙瘉锛31120180004
- |
- 缃戠粶瑙嗗惉璁稿彲璇侊細0909346
- |
- 骞挎挱鐢佃鑺傜洰鍒朵綔璁稿彲璇侊細娌瓧绗354鍙
- |
- 澧炲肩數淇′笟鍔＄粡钀ヨ鍙瘉锛氭勃B2-20120012
Copyright 漏 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
