Home 禄 Opinion 禄 Foreign Views
Problems from our past are always present
By Viktor Mayer Schonberger |
May 6, 2010, Thursday
|
Print Edition
Print Edition
"BE careful what you post on Facebook," US President Barack Obama warned American high school students this past September. "Whatever you do, it will be pulled up again later somewhere in your life."
In fact, we all are coming to learn that lesson the hard way: digital information almost never goes away. The result is the permanency of the past in the present.
This fact is one of the biggest challenges that society will face as computers and the Internet become more a part of everyday life.
For millennia, remembering information was costly and time-consuming, and to forget was a natural part of being human. In the digital age, the opposite is true: cheap computer storage, powerful processors, and ubiquitous Internet access have made remembering the norm.
But it is worth remembering that there is a lot of value in forgetting. Forgetting permits us to transcend details and generalize, to see the forest and not just the trees.
As some information lapses over time, the world becomes more comprehensible because we become free to focus on what is important.
Forgetting also enables us to forgive others.
But, with digital memory, that natural process is halted. Instead, the past is always present, ready to be called up with a few clicks on a keyboard or mobile phone.
Indeed, we are increasingly confronted with outdated information taken out of context, from anachronistic news stories to emotional e-mails and compromising pictures that we had long ago forgotten.
Obama's admonition reminds us to be more discriminating about what information we share online. His advice is essentially to practice a form of digital abstinence.
It is an understandable, pragmatic suggestion - but not necessarily a good one. We have much to gain individually and as a society from sharing information with each other. Too much self-censoring of what we do online would deny us the benefits of the Internet.
A better approach would be to ensure that digital information, like its offline variants of yesteryear, can disappear over time.
First, we could give digital files "expiration dates," so that our digital systems would delete the file when the appropriate time comes.
Second, we could opt to expose our information to a form of digital "rusting," so that it slowly erodes (and we would need to take proactive steps should we ever wish to recover some of it).
Third, we could separate past information, so that it takes a special effort or additional time to retrieve it, thereby reducing the chances that we accidentally stumble upon it.
The more we steam headlong into the future, the more we amalgamate the data and detritus of the past and place it irrevocably into the present.
Yet it is not just how information is stored and retrieved that needs to change, but how we think about information as well. The onus is on us as much as it is on the computer.
(The author is director of the Information & Innovation Policy Research Center at the National University of Singapore. Copyright: Project Syndicate/Institute for Human Sciences, 2010.www.project-syndicate.org.)
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 娌狪CP璇侊細娌狪CP澶05050403鍙-1
- |
- 浜掕仈缃戞柊闂讳俊鎭湇鍔¤鍙瘉锛31120180004
- |
- 缃戠粶瑙嗗惉璁稿彲璇侊細0909346
- |
- 骞挎挱鐢佃鑺傜洰鍒朵綔璁稿彲璇侊細娌瓧绗354鍙
- |
- 澧炲肩數淇′笟鍔＄粡钀ヨ鍙瘉锛氭勃B2-20120012
Copyright 漏 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
