“DEAR Mr Lam. I loved your essay, ‘The Palmist,’ but I can’t figure out what the main theme is. Is it dying and being all alone? My teacher suggests I read more of your writing... I’m glad I found you online.... Thank you very much for your help.”

The e-mail from, let’s call him “Evan,” is not atypical. Students assigned my work sometimes reached out to me for help. “The Palmist” is not an essay but a short story in my collection, “Birds of Paradise Lost.”

Its claim to fame is that it was read on Public Radio International’s (PRI’s) “Selected Shorts” program a few years ago by not just one but two well-known actors: David Strathairn, who played journalist Edward R. Murrow in “Good Night and Good Luck,” and later by James Naughton of the TV series “Gossip Girl.”

But never mind all that; for Evan it is immaterial. What’s more important is to have the answer, the main theme, since his paper is due.

While it flatters me to know that some of my work is being taught in high schools and colleges, and that I have done my share in confounding the mind of students near and far, it never fails to astound me what some of these young people would do to avoid thinking.

A classic e-mail I got some years ago was from a young woman named Dao. Her message came with the word “HELP” in caps in the subject line. “Dear Mr Lam,” it says, “My name is Dao and I am having difficulties with my essay in my English class. I am reading one of your short stories for class assignment called ‘Grandma’s Tales.’ It is a really good story but I can’t seem to find the REAL theme of the story. Can you please help me?”

No theme in mind

“Grandma’s Tales,” too, is collected in “Birds of Paradise Lost.” But to be perfectly honest, I didn’t have a theme in mind when I wrote that tongue-in-cheek story about a Vietnamese grandmother who dies, comes back to life and goes to a party with her grandson.

I once suggested a possible theme to another student but his teacher apparently didn’t like the answer. She told him he had best find a more serious theme.

The situation reminded me of Rodney Dangerfield as wealthy Thorton Melon, who went to the source with style in “Back to School.”

Mr Melon, deciding to go back to school in his 50s, hired the great Kurt Vonnegut Jr (who played himself in the movie) to write a paper about his own books, but the scheme backfired. Melon’s English professor, Diane Turner, was disappointed with the result. “Whoever wrote it didn’t know the first thing about Kurt Vonnegut,” she told him curtly, no pun intended. But at least, Vonnegut got paid.

Still, going to the source is rare. Students don’t usually e-mail writers to help with their homework.

No, increasingly, it would seem that they’d go online to look for other people’s homework instead.

“NEED HELP ASAP ENG/125,” is a post by a student on StudentofFortune.com on July 30, 2012. “Has anyone read the non-fiction stories?” the student asked. The “non-fiction stories,” also known as essays, are: “Who Will Light Incense When Mother’s Gone?” by Andrew Lam, (yours truly), Langston Hughes’ “Salvation,” Gretel Ehrlich’s “About Men,” and Joan Didion’s “On Going Home.”

While it is flattering as hell to even be mentioned in the same sentence with these great writers, let alone have one’s work compared and contrasted with theirs, it is distressing to know that students are offering between US$1 to US$10 for someone else’s work, so as to presumably avoid thinking.

The assignment? “Select two of these four writers and write a 1,400-1,700 word paper that would answer some of these questions: ‘What makes each of the selection non-fiction?’ and, ‘How is imagination required for writing and reading nonfiction? Why or why not’?”

What the student would do with the US$10 tutorial after it is paid for is up to him, of course — but I suspect most likely he’d be busy rearranging sentences and punctuation in hopes of escaping software programs that catch plagiarism.

But it seems the only imagination required here is not the literary kind and the bulk of critical thinking is used for anything but literature. It is spent in good part on methods that garner good grades without having to think about the work itself.

And if the student is still dissatisfied with Students of Fortune’s offerings? There’s always Studymode.com, which advertises to inspire a “better grade.”

Studymode.com offers some old homework that compared Langston Hughes’ “Salvation” and my essay, “Who Will Light Incense When Mother’s Gone?”

But since I didn’t pay, I only got a partial glimpse of some of them, and though not greatly instructed, I remain oddly jealous. Had I gotten half of the help the new generations are accessing, I would have flown through my English courses, instead of failing them at Berkeley.

In my defense, however, I did think for myself; I just wrote badly, due to the fact that English is my third language and I was still wearing donated jackets from Camp Pendleton, the Vietnamese refugees processing center in Southern California where my humble American life began.

Literature is not math

But I digress. Let’s get back to the “main theme” here.

There is something endearingly naive about students’ search for easy answers in literature, and how some approach literature as they would math problems.

That is, if x=5 and y=3 and 10/x + 4 - y= Z, which is really the main theme of “The Palmist”, then what is Z? The answer is 3, or y, but for all practical purposes Z might as well equal aging and dying all alone.

Alas, the problem with serious literature is that “the definition” and the “real theme” are never obvious, if they exist at all.

The reader’s sensibilities play a strong role in coming up with a theme or two, if he or she were to think critically at all about the work. And, surely, it involves the reader’s own imagination.

So — “Dear Evan: It may not occur to you that there might be more than one theme to any story, and that, more often than not, there are no wrong answers in literature, only well-argued propositions. May I suggest that, as I suggested to others who came before you asking for ‘main’ or ‘real’ themes, you go sit under a tree and read ‘The Palmist’ aloud to a few friends who can listen well? They’ll probably have a better answer than I do. And once you figured out what that theme is, do put it up in paperdue.com or some such websites. And when I can afford membership, I’ll be sure to log in and read it.”

New America Media editor Andrew Lam is the author of “Perfume Dreams: Reflections on the Vietnamese Diaspora,”  and “East Eats West: Writing in Two Hemispheres.” His latest book about the immigrant experience is “Birds of Paradise Lost.”