Home » Opinion » Foreign Views
US 'liberates' Iraq, but bars Iraqi refugees
By Andrew Lam |
January 19, 2012, Thursday
|
Print Edition
Print Edition
EACH time Uncle Sam ventures abroad he leaves an unfinished story, and nothing is most unfinished than the story of Iraq, where despite flowery speeches regarding freedom and sovereignty by the Obama administration, despite assurances that tyranny has been "cast aside," the tragedy caused by the United States invasion, occupation and inevitable abandonment is on an epic proportion.
The most unfinished story is the population that the war has displaced. Whether tyranny has been cast aside is questionable, but certainly cast aside are the people of Iraq.
They have been displaced both internally and internationally and are now imperiled by the sin of our omission.
According to the office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), there are 1.7 million Iraqis living as internally displaced refugees, while more than 2 million others have fled across the border to Syria, Egypt, Jordan and other countries.
A theme of betrayal
If the unfinished story has a theme, then it is surely betrayal. It is a painful lesson previous allies of the United States have learned, a bitter pill to swallow.
Uncle Sam left unwanted children in Vietnam known as con lai - mixed-race children - and it took years for them to come to the US, years in which many lived as abused and abandoned street children, as enemies of a society ashamed of their appearance and what they represented - children of the enemy.
Uncle Sam also left tens of thousands of South Vietnamese allies to languish in re-education camps.
Largest exodus
"The current exodus (from Iraq) is the largest long-term population movement in the Middle East since the displacement of Palestinians following the creation of Israel in 1948," according to the office of the UNHCR, the UN refugee agency.
Although some have managed to integrate into host countries, the majority are destitute. Desperate to feed their family, many women have resorted to prostitution or become indentured servants.
At the height of the US occupation, as fighting worsened, many crossed the borders seeking safety.
Jordan, Syria, Turkey, Saudi Arabia all saw a rise in Iraqi refugees. Syria in particular, which shares a 450-mile border with Iraq, bore the brunt of the mass exodus.
Syrian officials estimate more than 700,000 Iraqis of all stripes are now living inside their country. Nearly half of the children receive no schooling.
The number of refugees immigrating to the United States is at a trickle in comparison.
So far only 58,811 Iraqis have been granted refugee status here. Indeed, if the US has won for Iraq its freedom and democracy, as our government claims, why - goes the logic - should we accept refugees?
In the US, Homeland Security has enhanced its bureaucratic procedures, squeezing the immigration process so tightly that tens of thousands of those who qualify to come to the United States are languishing instead either in Iraq or elsewhere.
Their lives are exponentially endangered now that US forces have pulled out.
Various insurgent groups have targeted those working as interpreters for the US and British armies or for foreign journalists - not to mention those hired by American companies doing reconstruction or working in the Green Zone.
"The Iraqis who stood with us are being targeted for assassination, yet our doors are shut. That is not how we treat our friends," President Obama said while campaigning for the White House in 2008.
That same year Congress passed a bill for special immigration visas to be issued for 25,000, although so far only 3,415 have been processed.
"We're not meeting our basic obligation to the Iraqis, who've been imperiled because they worked for the US government," noted Kirk W. Johnson in a New York Times article four years ago.
Johnson, who worked for the United States Agency for International Development in Falluja in 2005, observed, "We could not have functioned without their hard work, and it's shameful that we've nothing to offer them in their bleakest hour."
More recently he noted in The Times that "our policy in the final weeks of this war is as simple as it is shameful: Submit your paperwork and wait."
Do we have a moral obligation to those whose lives are endangered by their relationship with us, lives imperiled due to our intervention in Iraq?
No permanent friends
If the answer is no, then our Afghan partners might do well to consider other options and we should also ask what America really stands for.
If the answer is no, the United States might consider removing the plaque at the base of the Statue of Liberty on which we boast, "Give me your tired, your poor/ Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free."
The new one should read, "Nations have no permanent friends and no permanent enemies. Only permanent interests."
New America Media editor Andrew Lam is author of "Perfume Dreams: Reflections on the Vietnamese Diaspora"and "East Eats West: Writing in Two Hemispheres." His next book, Birds of Paradise," is due out in 2013. Shanghai Daily condensed the article.
The most unfinished story is the population that the war has displaced. Whether tyranny has been cast aside is questionable, but certainly cast aside are the people of Iraq.
They have been displaced both internally and internationally and are now imperiled by the sin of our omission.
According to the office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), there are 1.7 million Iraqis living as internally displaced refugees, while more than 2 million others have fled across the border to Syria, Egypt, Jordan and other countries.
A theme of betrayal
If the unfinished story has a theme, then it is surely betrayal. It is a painful lesson previous allies of the United States have learned, a bitter pill to swallow.
Uncle Sam left unwanted children in Vietnam known as con lai - mixed-race children - and it took years for them to come to the US, years in which many lived as abused and abandoned street children, as enemies of a society ashamed of their appearance and what they represented - children of the enemy.
Uncle Sam also left tens of thousands of South Vietnamese allies to languish in re-education camps.
Largest exodus
"The current exodus (from Iraq) is the largest long-term population movement in the Middle East since the displacement of Palestinians following the creation of Israel in 1948," according to the office of the UNHCR, the UN refugee agency.
Although some have managed to integrate into host countries, the majority are destitute. Desperate to feed their family, many women have resorted to prostitution or become indentured servants.
At the height of the US occupation, as fighting worsened, many crossed the borders seeking safety.
Jordan, Syria, Turkey, Saudi Arabia all saw a rise in Iraqi refugees. Syria in particular, which shares a 450-mile border with Iraq, bore the brunt of the mass exodus.
Syrian officials estimate more than 700,000 Iraqis of all stripes are now living inside their country. Nearly half of the children receive no schooling.
The number of refugees immigrating to the United States is at a trickle in comparison.
So far only 58,811 Iraqis have been granted refugee status here. Indeed, if the US has won for Iraq its freedom and democracy, as our government claims, why - goes the logic - should we accept refugees?
In the US, Homeland Security has enhanced its bureaucratic procedures, squeezing the immigration process so tightly that tens of thousands of those who qualify to come to the United States are languishing instead either in Iraq or elsewhere.
Their lives are exponentially endangered now that US forces have pulled out.
Various insurgent groups have targeted those working as interpreters for the US and British armies or for foreign journalists - not to mention those hired by American companies doing reconstruction or working in the Green Zone.
"The Iraqis who stood with us are being targeted for assassination, yet our doors are shut. That is not how we treat our friends," President Obama said while campaigning for the White House in 2008.
That same year Congress passed a bill for special immigration visas to be issued for 25,000, although so far only 3,415 have been processed.
"We're not meeting our basic obligation to the Iraqis, who've been imperiled because they worked for the US government," noted Kirk W. Johnson in a New York Times article four years ago.
Johnson, who worked for the United States Agency for International Development in Falluja in 2005, observed, "We could not have functioned without their hard work, and it's shameful that we've nothing to offer them in their bleakest hour."
More recently he noted in The Times that "our policy in the final weeks of this war is as simple as it is shameful: Submit your paperwork and wait."
Do we have a moral obligation to those whose lives are endangered by their relationship with us, lives imperiled due to our intervention in Iraq?
No permanent friends
If the answer is no, then our Afghan partners might do well to consider other options and we should also ask what America really stands for.
If the answer is no, the United States might consider removing the plaque at the base of the Statue of Liberty on which we boast, "Give me your tired, your poor/ Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free."
The new one should read, "Nations have no permanent friends and no permanent enemies. Only permanent interests."
New America Media editor Andrew Lam is author of "Perfume Dreams: Reflections on the Vietnamese Diaspora"and "East Eats West: Writing in Two Hemispheres." His next book, Birds of Paradise," is due out in 2013. Shanghai Daily condensed the article.
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 沪ICP证：沪ICP备05050403号-1
- |
- 互联网新闻信息服务许可证：31120180004
- |
- 网络视听许可证：0909346
- |
- 广播电视节目制作许可证：沪字第354号
- |
- 增值电信业务经营许可证：沪B2-20120012
Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
