Expert seeks common consensus among bodies
Source: Agencies |
April 2, 2010, Friday
|
Print Edition
Print Edition
TOP sports organizations need to agree on a common solution for testing their athletes for performance-enhancing substances like human growth hormone (HGH), a veteran anti-doping authority said.
Dr Don Catlin, chief executive of Anti-Doping Research Inc, said the National Football League, Major League Baseball, World Anti-Doping Agency, US Anti-Doping Agency and other agencies should meet and discuss where drug testing is headed.
Catlin, who began his career in anti-doping by founding the Olympic drug testing lab for the 1984 Los Angeles Games, is hoping to organize the summit. "If we can get together the key people in the same room and speak frankly about the issues we all face we can agree on solutions and move things forward," Catlin said.
"We came up with the idea (for a summit) after I kept seeing the articles with all this rancor and reasons why things weren't getting done. I think if we can put those things aside, we'll be able to make progress."
According to Catlin, any interested parties need to make an effort to cut through the roadblocks, financial challenges and bickering that he said has hampered the quest for a HGH test that can be administered by all sporting organizations.
Currently, a blood test is the only way to detect HGH. The Olympic sports use it and the Australian Football League said they will soon use it as well. North American professional sports leagues do not test for HGH.
Catlin, who gained fame for his work developing tests for previously undetectable steroids and forms of erythropoietin, or EPO, - a blood booster - said developing a test to be used to sanction athletes has two distinct stages.
The first step, he said, is establishing scientific proof that the athlete has taken a prohibited substance. The second step is validating that test so it is considered "bulletproof" by the legal community.
"It can't just be the courts who decide whether or not a test is valid," Catlin said. "The science has to be solid. You can't have any ambiguity or ways for lawyers to raise doubts."
Earlier this month British rugby league player Terry Newton became the first athlete to be sanctioned after giving the first positive test for HGH from a blood sample in any sport. Newton was suspended for two years.
The response to this breakthrough was mixed as the Olympic community lauded it as proof that HGH could be detected, while the NFL and MLB said blood tests could not be easily enforced.
Catlin is not unsympathetic to concerns that blood testing is less desirable than urine testing, but he said that does not mean professional leagues should not use blood testing now in an attempt to deter the use of HGH by athletes.
Dr Don Catlin, chief executive of Anti-Doping Research Inc, said the National Football League, Major League Baseball, World Anti-Doping Agency, US Anti-Doping Agency and other agencies should meet and discuss where drug testing is headed.
Catlin, who began his career in anti-doping by founding the Olympic drug testing lab for the 1984 Los Angeles Games, is hoping to organize the summit. "If we can get together the key people in the same room and speak frankly about the issues we all face we can agree on solutions and move things forward," Catlin said.
"We came up with the idea (for a summit) after I kept seeing the articles with all this rancor and reasons why things weren't getting done. I think if we can put those things aside, we'll be able to make progress."
According to Catlin, any interested parties need to make an effort to cut through the roadblocks, financial challenges and bickering that he said has hampered the quest for a HGH test that can be administered by all sporting organizations.
Currently, a blood test is the only way to detect HGH. The Olympic sports use it and the Australian Football League said they will soon use it as well. North American professional sports leagues do not test for HGH.
Catlin, who gained fame for his work developing tests for previously undetectable steroids and forms of erythropoietin, or EPO, - a blood booster - said developing a test to be used to sanction athletes has two distinct stages.
The first step, he said, is establishing scientific proof that the athlete has taken a prohibited substance. The second step is validating that test so it is considered "bulletproof" by the legal community.
"It can't just be the courts who decide whether or not a test is valid," Catlin said. "The science has to be solid. You can't have any ambiguity or ways for lawyers to raise doubts."
Earlier this month British rugby league player Terry Newton became the first athlete to be sanctioned after giving the first positive test for HGH from a blood sample in any sport. Newton was suspended for two years.
The response to this breakthrough was mixed as the Olympic community lauded it as proof that HGH could be detected, while the NFL and MLB said blood tests could not be easily enforced.
Catlin is not unsympathetic to concerns that blood testing is less desirable than urine testing, but he said that does not mean professional leagues should not use blood testing now in an attempt to deter the use of HGH by athletes.
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 沪ICP证：沪ICP备05050403号-1
- |
- 互联网新闻信息服务许可证：31120180004
- |
- 网络视听许可证：0909346
- |
- 广播电视节目制作许可证：沪字第354号
- |
- 增值电信业务经营许可证：沪B2-20120012
Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
