The story appears on

Page A13

April 20, 2014

GET this page in PDF

Free for subscribers

View shopping cart

Related News

Home » Sunday » Book

Updike biography sparkles

DURING his lifetime, John Updike was acclaimed as one of the greatest writers of his generation, the poet laureate of middle-class, small-town, Protestant America.

From the time he was a boy, submitting articles and drawings to school newspapers in his beloved hometown of Shillington, until his 2009 death at age 76, he produced an endless stream of short stories, novels, essays, poetry and criticism — more than 60 books in just over 50 years.

Now, after five years at work in the Updike archives, Adam Begley has written an indispensable guide to the man and his work. A former books editor at the New York Observer, Begley approaches his subject from the perspective of a literary critic, focusing mainly on biographical material that illuminates the work.

As Updike himself often acknowledged, his life was the basis for his fiction.

Begley carefully, decade by decade, documents the similarities, identifying in short stories from the late 1950s, for instance, the first glimmers of adulterous feelings that Updike would famously explore in 1968’s “Couples.”

“The more Updike one reads, and the more one learns about his life, the more blatantly obvious it becomes that he was enthralled by the detail of his own experience,” Begley writes. Yet Updike’s fiction was not merely “the prose equivalent to a live webcam,” he adds. “He selected, he edited ... sharpening the blur of daily life so that meanings began to emerge.”

Updike called it his “relentless domestic realism,” and it reached its apogee in the four Rabbit novels about everyman Harry “Rabbit” Angstrom, each one set in a different decade against the backdrop of a changing America, from the 1950s through the 1980s.

Begley, whose father, the novelist Louis Begley, was a classmate of Updike’s at Harvard, is particularly well-suited for the job of Updike biographer.

Begley’s affection hasn’t blinded him to Updike’s shortcomings, including the oft-heard complaint that he objectified women. He sees Updike’s strengths and his weaknesses, and presents the full measure of the man in this engrossing and fair-minded book.




 

Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.

沪公网安备 31010602000204号

Email this to your friend