The story appears on

Page A12

April 3, 2014

GET this page in PDF

Free for subscribers

View shopping cart

Related News

Home » World

Australia recognizes 3rd gender

AUSTRALIA’S highest court yesterday recognized the existence of a third “non-specific” gender that is neither male nor female, in a landmark ruling campaigners said will help end years of discrimination.

The High Court ruled that not everyone should be forced to identify as a man or woman when dealing with officials, saying some people could legitimately describe themselves as gender neutral.

“The High Court... recognizes that a person may be neither male nor female, and so permits the registration of a person’s sex as ‘non-specific,’” it said in a unanimous judgement.

The decision ended a long legal battle by sexual equality campaigner Norrie to overturn a New South Wales state edict that gender is an inherently “binary” concept involving only men or women.

“I’m overjoyed,” the Sydney-based activist said. “It’s been a long time from start to end but this has been a great outcome.

“Maybe people will understand now that there’s more options than just the binary. So while an individual might be male or female, not all their friends might be and maybe they might be more accepting of that.”

The 53-year-old, who uses only a single name, was born male and underwent gender reassignment surgery in 1989 to become a woman.

But the surgery failed to resolve the Scottish-born activist’s ambiguity about sexual identity, prompting a push for the recognition of a new, non-traditional gender.

Norrie made global headlines in 2010 when an application to the NSW Department of Births, Deaths and Marriages accepted that “sex non-specific” could be accepted for Norrie’s records.

But soon afterward the office revoked its decision, saying the certificate was issued in error.

That sparked a series of appeals which resulted in the NSW Court of Appeal recognizing Norrie as gender neutral last year, a decision which the High Court backed yesterday.

The Human Rights Law Centre, which provided expert testimony, said the court had “rejected outdated notions of gender” in the decision.

The center’s litigation expert Anna Brown said under the law only a person who had undergone gender reassignment surgery could nominate themselves as “non-specific.”

Brown added that it remains unclear who gender-neutral people would be able to marry.




 

Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.

沪公网安备 31010602000204号

Email this to your friend