Related News
Doctors urged to warn against cellphone use in cars
PHYSICIANS should tell patients not to send text messages or use cellphones while driving, just as they advise them against smoking or to use seat belts, a doctor said in the influential New England Journal of Medicine yesterday.
"It's time for us to ask patients about driving and distraction," Dr. Amy Ship of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical center and Harvard Medical School in Boston wrote in a featured commentary in the journal.
She said keeping people off cellphones while they are behind the wheel is an important public safety health measure. "Not to ask -- and not to educate our patients and reduce their risk -- is to place in harm's way those we hope to heal," Ship wrote.
Ship cited growing evidence of the dangers that cellphones posed to people on the road. The National Safety Council has estimated that 28 percent of U.S. traffic accidents -- 1.6 million -- involve use of cellphones.
The most obvious problem is texting, where people use the cellphone keypad to send email or similar messages. A 2009 study concluded that texting while driving raised the risk of an accident by 23 times.
At least 28 U.S. states now ban texting while driving.
But Ship also urged doctors to tell their patients not to talk on cellphones while driving, and to lock them in the trunk during their trip if that is what it took to avoid the impulse to use them.
She said a 2006 study found that talking on a cellphone posed the same risk as driving while intoxicated, even if the driver was not holding the phone. "Driving while distracted is roughly equivalent to driving drunk," she wrote.
"In 98 percent of people, reaction time suffers dramatically," Ship said in a telephone interview after making sure the reporter was not driving during the call.
Ship said talking with a hands-free unit was more dangerous than to talking to someone in the car. "You're more engaged with your environment than when someone is not present," she said.
Listening to the radio or music is not the same kind of distraction. "One cannot tune out someone on the phone the way you can the radio," Ship said. "You don't have to reply to the radio."
Ship said doctors could play a key role in reducing cellphone-related accidents, just as a patient was more likely to quit smoking if a doctor spent three minutes discussing the risks of tobacco use.
"Although there are many possible distractions for drivers, more than 275 million Americans own cell phones, and 81 percent of them talk on those phones while driving," Ship wrote.
"When patients aren't convinced, I ask them, 'How would you feel if the surgeon removing your appendix talked on the phone -- hands free, of course -- while operating?' This hypothetical captures the essence of the problem -- the challenge of concentrating fully on the task at hand while engaged in a phone conversation."
"It's time for us to ask patients about driving and distraction," Dr. Amy Ship of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical center and Harvard Medical School in Boston wrote in a featured commentary in the journal.
She said keeping people off cellphones while they are behind the wheel is an important public safety health measure. "Not to ask -- and not to educate our patients and reduce their risk -- is to place in harm's way those we hope to heal," Ship wrote.
Ship cited growing evidence of the dangers that cellphones posed to people on the road. The National Safety Council has estimated that 28 percent of U.S. traffic accidents -- 1.6 million -- involve use of cellphones.
The most obvious problem is texting, where people use the cellphone keypad to send email or similar messages. A 2009 study concluded that texting while driving raised the risk of an accident by 23 times.
At least 28 U.S. states now ban texting while driving.
But Ship also urged doctors to tell their patients not to talk on cellphones while driving, and to lock them in the trunk during their trip if that is what it took to avoid the impulse to use them.
She said a 2006 study found that talking on a cellphone posed the same risk as driving while intoxicated, even if the driver was not holding the phone. "Driving while distracted is roughly equivalent to driving drunk," she wrote.
"In 98 percent of people, reaction time suffers dramatically," Ship said in a telephone interview after making sure the reporter was not driving during the call.
Ship said talking with a hands-free unit was more dangerous than to talking to someone in the car. "You're more engaged with your environment than when someone is not present," she said.
Listening to the radio or music is not the same kind of distraction. "One cannot tune out someone on the phone the way you can the radio," Ship said. "You don't have to reply to the radio."
Ship said doctors could play a key role in reducing cellphone-related accidents, just as a patient was more likely to quit smoking if a doctor spent three minutes discussing the risks of tobacco use.
"Although there are many possible distractions for drivers, more than 275 million Americans own cell phones, and 81 percent of them talk on those phones while driving," Ship wrote.
"When patients aren't convinced, I ask them, 'How would you feel if the surgeon removing your appendix talked on the phone -- hands free, of course -- while operating?' This hypothetical captures the essence of the problem -- the challenge of concentrating fully on the task at hand while engaged in a phone conversation."
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS
- |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 沪ICP证:沪ICP备05050403号-1
- |
- 互联网新闻信息服务许可证:31120180004
- |
- 网络视听许可证:0909346
- |
- 广播电视节目制作许可证:沪字第354号
- |
- 增值电信业务经营许可证:沪B2-20120012
Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.