India poised to ban foreigners as surrogacy industry feels the heat
Print Edition
India鈥檚 government said yesterday it would ban foreigners from using surrogate mothers in the country, a move likely to hit the booming commercial surrogacy industry.
Ranks of childless foreign couples have flocked to the country in recent years looking for a cheap, legal and simple route to parenthood.
Health industry estimates put the size of India鈥檚 surrogacy business at 9 billion rupees (US$138 million) and growing at 20 percent a year.
But critics have said a lack of legislation encourages 鈥渞ent-a-womb鈥 exploitation of young, poor Indian women.
In an affidavit to the Supreme Court yesterday the government said it 鈥渄oes not support commercial surrogacy.鈥
鈥淣o foreigners can avail surrogacy services in India,鈥 it told the court, which is hearing a petition regarding the industry, adding that surrogacy would be available 鈥渙nly for Indian couples.鈥
Thousands of infertile couples, many from overseas, hire the wombs of Indian women to carry their embryos through to birth.
India, with cheap technology, skilled doctors and a steady supply of local surrogates, is one of relatively few countries where women can be paid to carry another鈥檚 child.
Surrogacy for profit is illegal in many other countries.
The process usually involves in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer, leading to a rise in fertility centers offering such services.
A top fertility expert branded the government鈥檚 move discriminatory, while a leading women鈥檚 activist warned it could push the industry underground and out of reach of regulators.
鈥淏anning commercial surrogacy will send some couples onto the black market and deprive other couples of the chance of children,鈥 Ranjana Kumari, director of the Centre for Social Research, said.
鈥淥ur research shows many surrogates do not have health insurance and are paid poorly, among other issues,鈥 she said, adding that stronger regulation rather than an outright ban was needed.
The private petition to the top court seeks a halt to the importation of human embryos for commercial purposes.
Earlier this month the court in Delhi expressed its concern and ordered the government to spell out measures for regulating the industry.
The government鈥檚 affidavit, presented to the court by Solicitor General Ranjit Kumar, said it would 鈥渞equire some time to bring the law in place.鈥
鈥淭he government will prohibit and penalize commercial surrogacy services,鈥 it said.
The government has been consulting women鈥檚 groups and the health industry on a draft bill, the Assisted Reproductive Technology, that seeks to regulate the industry.
Clinic owners denied ill-treatment of surrogate mothers, saying it is in their interests to treat the women well so they produce healthy babies.
Dr Nayana Patel, one of India鈥檚 leading fertility specialists, said the move discriminated against foreigners who were also desperate to have children.
鈥淵es, there need to be strict checks and counter checks but banning foreigners is not the answer. It鈥檚 inhuman,鈥 she said. 鈥淭here is no exploitation, it鈥檚 a voluntary contract between human beings involving an exchange of money. What鈥檚 wrong with that?鈥
鈥淚t鈥檚 a dignified earning. Instead of women working as maids, they can be surrogates,鈥 said Patel, who runs the Akanksha fertility clinic in the western state of Gujarat.
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 娌狪CP璇侊細娌狪CP澶05050403鍙-1
- |
- 浜掕仈缃戞柊闂讳俊鎭湇鍔¤鍙瘉锛31120180004
- |
- 缃戠粶瑙嗗惉璁稿彲璇侊細0909346
- |
- 骞挎挱鐢佃鑺傜洰鍒朵綔璁稿彲璇侊細娌瓧绗354鍙
- |
- 澧炲肩數淇′笟鍔＄粡钀ヨ鍙瘉锛氭勃B2-20120012
Copyright 漏 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
