Italy court convicts 7 for no quake warning
Source: AFP |
October 23, 2012, Tuesday
|
Print Edition
Print Edition
SIX Italian scientists and a government official were found guilty yesterday of multiple manslaughter for underestimating the risks of a killer earthquake in the town of L'Aquila in 2009.
They were sentenced to six years in jail in the watershed ruling in a case that has provoked outrage in the international science community.
Prosecutor Fabio Picuti had asked for jail sentences of four years for each defendant for failing to alert the population of the walled medieval town to the risks, days before the 6.3-magnitude quake killed 309 people.
All seven were members of the Major Risks Committee which met in the central Italian town on March 31, 2009, six days before the quake devastated the region.
Picuti yesterday compared the committee to the US Federal Emergency Management Agency, which was castigated for failing to assess the risks before Hurricane Katrina devastated New Orleans in 2005.
FEMA head Michael Brown resigned in the wake of the disaster, and Picuti blamed a similar "failure of initiative" to forecast the risks for L'Aquila.
But Alfredo Biondi, the lawyer for expert Claudio Eva, rejected his claim, saying: "While floods and hurricanes can be forecast, earthquakes cannot."
The bright blue, classroom-sized temporary tribunal in L'Aquila, built on an industrial estate after the town's court was flattened in the quake, was crowded with lawyers, advisers and media for the verdict.
Four of the defendants were in court, as well as a small group of survivors.
"They were not expected to predict the earthquake but they were expected to alert people to the risks," said lawyer Wania dell Vigna, who represents 11 plaintiffs, including an Israeli student who died when a student residence collapsed.
A relative of one of the victims said her sister died because "she was reassured by the experts and slept at home that night."
In his summing up, Picuti said the experts had provided "an incomplete, inept, unsuitable and criminally mistaken" analysis, which reassured locals and led many to stay indoors when the first tremors hit.
The committee met after a series of small tremors in the preceding weeks had sown panic among local inhabitants.
Top seismologists were called in to evaluate the situation and the then vice-director of the Civil Protection Agency, Bernardo De Bernardinis, gave press interviews saying the seismic activity posed "no danger."
The prosecution accused Bernardinis of using the meeting to calm the residents - he famously advised them to relax with a glass of wine.
Over 5,000 members of the scientific community sent an open letter to President Giorgio Napolitano denouncing the trial for failing to predict an earthquake - a feat widely acknowledged to be impossible.
They were sentenced to six years in jail in the watershed ruling in a case that has provoked outrage in the international science community.
Prosecutor Fabio Picuti had asked for jail sentences of four years for each defendant for failing to alert the population of the walled medieval town to the risks, days before the 6.3-magnitude quake killed 309 people.
All seven were members of the Major Risks Committee which met in the central Italian town on March 31, 2009, six days before the quake devastated the region.
Picuti yesterday compared the committee to the US Federal Emergency Management Agency, which was castigated for failing to assess the risks before Hurricane Katrina devastated New Orleans in 2005.
FEMA head Michael Brown resigned in the wake of the disaster, and Picuti blamed a similar "failure of initiative" to forecast the risks for L'Aquila.
But Alfredo Biondi, the lawyer for expert Claudio Eva, rejected his claim, saying: "While floods and hurricanes can be forecast, earthquakes cannot."
The bright blue, classroom-sized temporary tribunal in L'Aquila, built on an industrial estate after the town's court was flattened in the quake, was crowded with lawyers, advisers and media for the verdict.
Four of the defendants were in court, as well as a small group of survivors.
"They were not expected to predict the earthquake but they were expected to alert people to the risks," said lawyer Wania dell Vigna, who represents 11 plaintiffs, including an Israeli student who died when a student residence collapsed.
A relative of one of the victims said her sister died because "she was reassured by the experts and slept at home that night."
In his summing up, Picuti said the experts had provided "an incomplete, inept, unsuitable and criminally mistaken" analysis, which reassured locals and led many to stay indoors when the first tremors hit.
The committee met after a series of small tremors in the preceding weeks had sown panic among local inhabitants.
Top seismologists were called in to evaluate the situation and the then vice-director of the Civil Protection Agency, Bernardo De Bernardinis, gave press interviews saying the seismic activity posed "no danger."
The prosecution accused Bernardinis of using the meeting to calm the residents - he famously advised them to relax with a glass of wine.
Over 5,000 members of the scientific community sent an open letter to President Giorgio Napolitano denouncing the trial for failing to predict an earthquake - a feat widely acknowledged to be impossible.
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 沪ICP证：沪ICP备05050403号-1
- |
- 互联网新闻信息服务许可证：31120180004
- |
- 网络视听许可证：0909346
- |
- 广播电视节目制作许可证：沪字第354号
- |
- 增值电信业务经营许可证：沪B2-20120012
Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
