Related News
Obama steps up attack on anonymous campaign money
Source: Agencies |
October 13, 2010, Wednesday
|
Online Edition
Online Edition
US President Barack Obama yesterday stepped up his attack on anonymous campaign donations by foreign corporate interests, despite the insistence of business groups that the claim was baseless.
Taking care not to point the finger directly at anyone, Obama said the campaign money could be coming from the oil industry to counter his environmental policies, or from financial firms who dislike his Wall Street reforms.
"We don't know if they are being funded by foreign corporations, because they're not disclosed," Obama told a meeting of Democratic supporters.
Republicans are expected to make strong gains in the congressional elections on November 2 as voters are seen punishing Obama's Democrats for a stuttering economy with unemployment stuck near 10 percent.
The Republicans say Americans care about job creation, not campaign finance.
The US Chamber of Commerce, targeted by the Democratic Party in a television advertisement picturing a stack of Chinese bank notes, said the White House was conducting a smear campaign to distract voters from the weak economy.
"We are seeing an attempt to demonize specific groups and distract Americans from a failed economic agenda," said Bruce Josten, executive vice president at the Chamber. "With three weeks until Election Day, it's time to return to the discussion that Americans care most about: job creation."
All 435 seats in the US House of Representatives and 37 of the 100 Senate seats are up for grabs next month. Polls show Republicans could win control of the House and may even challenge Democratic command of the Senate.
Obama, who has criticized a Supreme Court ruling that opened US election campaigns to corporate money as a boon for big business, said he wanted the Court to reverse its decision.
"I hope that the Supreme Court at some point looks at the evidence that's accumulated over the last several months and says this is really hijacking our democracy, this is not a healthy thing," Obama said.
The Court's ruling in January involved a group called Citizens United and cited free speech rights guaranteed in the first amendment to the US Constitution. The ruling overturned a ban on political spending by corporations in elections.
The White House stepped up its attacks against anonymous funding of anti-Democrat advertising and shrugged off claims it was trying to distract voters.
"If there are organizations raising tens of millions of dollars who won't tell us who their donors are, my guess is they're not telling us for a reason -- because they have something to hide," said White House spokesman Robert Gibbs.
"The best way to clear any of this stuff up would simply be to disclose the names."
Taking care not to point the finger directly at anyone, Obama said the campaign money could be coming from the oil industry to counter his environmental policies, or from financial firms who dislike his Wall Street reforms.
"We don't know if they are being funded by foreign corporations, because they're not disclosed," Obama told a meeting of Democratic supporters.
Republicans are expected to make strong gains in the congressional elections on November 2 as voters are seen punishing Obama's Democrats for a stuttering economy with unemployment stuck near 10 percent.
The Republicans say Americans care about job creation, not campaign finance.
The US Chamber of Commerce, targeted by the Democratic Party in a television advertisement picturing a stack of Chinese bank notes, said the White House was conducting a smear campaign to distract voters from the weak economy.
"We are seeing an attempt to demonize specific groups and distract Americans from a failed economic agenda," said Bruce Josten, executive vice president at the Chamber. "With three weeks until Election Day, it's time to return to the discussion that Americans care most about: job creation."
All 435 seats in the US House of Representatives and 37 of the 100 Senate seats are up for grabs next month. Polls show Republicans could win control of the House and may even challenge Democratic command of the Senate.
Obama, who has criticized a Supreme Court ruling that opened US election campaigns to corporate money as a boon for big business, said he wanted the Court to reverse its decision.
"I hope that the Supreme Court at some point looks at the evidence that's accumulated over the last several months and says this is really hijacking our democracy, this is not a healthy thing," Obama said.
The Court's ruling in January involved a group called Citizens United and cited free speech rights guaranteed in the first amendment to the US Constitution. The ruling overturned a ban on political spending by corporations in elections.
The White House stepped up its attacks against anonymous funding of anti-Democrat advertising and shrugged off claims it was trying to distract voters.
"If there are organizations raising tens of millions of dollars who won't tell us who their donors are, my guess is they're not telling us for a reason -- because they have something to hide," said White House spokesman Robert Gibbs.
"The best way to clear any of this stuff up would simply be to disclose the names."
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 沪ICP证：沪ICP备05050403号-1
- |
- 互联网新闻信息服务许可证：31120180004
- |
- 网络视听许可证：0909346
- |
- 广播电视节目制作许可证：沪字第354号
- |
- 增值电信业务经营许可证：沪B2-20120012
Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
