Rowling plagiarism lawsuit dropped
Source: Agencies |
July 19, 2011, Tuesday
|
Print Edition
Print Edition
A LAWSUIT that accused JK Rowling of copying the work of another children's author when writing "Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire" has been dropped in Britain, after the claimant failed to come up with the cash ordered by a judge as security.
The estate of late author Adrian Jacobs said that the plot for the Potter novel, the fourth of seven boy wizard stories that have sold more than 400 millions copies, borrowed parts of his book "Willy the Wizard."
"The case is dead for now," Max Markson, spokesman for the estate, said yesterday. "Can it be revived? Yes, it could be taken up in another country, another jurisdiction," he added.
Markson told a newspaper in 2010 the lawsuit could be worth hundreds of millions of dollars.
The lawsuit had already been dismissed in the United States, and a judge at London's High Court said last year that the assertions of the claimant were "improbable."
But he turned down an application by lawyers for Rowling and her publisher Bloomsbury to dismiss the case outright.
Jacobs' estate was, however, required to pay a total of 1.6 million pounds (US$2.6 million) to the court as a security against costs of the case should it eventually go to trial.
It failed to meet last Friday's deadline to produce the first tranche of the money.
Bloomsbury and Rowling have consistently denied that she copied "substantial parts" of "The Adventures of Willy the Wizard - No.1 Livid Land," written by Jacobs in 1987.
Her publisher said she had never heard of Jacobs' book before the copyright claim was first made in 2004.
Jacobs' estate said Goblet of Fire copied elements of the story, including a wizard contest, and that the Potter series borrowed the idea of wizards traveling on trains.
The estate of late author Adrian Jacobs said that the plot for the Potter novel, the fourth of seven boy wizard stories that have sold more than 400 millions copies, borrowed parts of his book "Willy the Wizard."
"The case is dead for now," Max Markson, spokesman for the estate, said yesterday. "Can it be revived? Yes, it could be taken up in another country, another jurisdiction," he added.
Markson told a newspaper in 2010 the lawsuit could be worth hundreds of millions of dollars.
The lawsuit had already been dismissed in the United States, and a judge at London's High Court said last year that the assertions of the claimant were "improbable."
But he turned down an application by lawyers for Rowling and her publisher Bloomsbury to dismiss the case outright.
Jacobs' estate was, however, required to pay a total of 1.6 million pounds (US$2.6 million) to the court as a security against costs of the case should it eventually go to trial.
It failed to meet last Friday's deadline to produce the first tranche of the money.
Bloomsbury and Rowling have consistently denied that she copied "substantial parts" of "The Adventures of Willy the Wizard - No.1 Livid Land," written by Jacobs in 1987.
Her publisher said she had never heard of Jacobs' book before the copyright claim was first made in 2004.
Jacobs' estate said Goblet of Fire copied elements of the story, including a wizard contest, and that the Potter series borrowed the idea of wizards traveling on trains.
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 沪ICP证：沪ICP备05050403号-1
- |
- 互联网新闻信息服务许可证：31120180004
- |
- 网络视听许可证：0909346
- |
- 广播电视节目制作许可证：沪字第354号
- |
- 增值电信业务经营许可证：沪B2-20120012
Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
