The story appears on

Page A3

February 2, 2011

GET this page in PDF

Free for subscribers

View shopping cart

Related News

Home » World

Sane, or not sane, that was the question ...

A NOTORIOUS criminal case that waited 400 years to go before a jury resulted in no definite answer to the question of whether the defendant - Hamlet, Prince of Denmark - was sane when he committed murder.

US Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy presided over a mock trial at the University of Southern California on Monday night, an event sponsored by the Shakespeare Center of Los Angeles. The hung jury, which included actors Helen Hunt and Tom Irwin, deliberated as an audience watched a video feed.

Of the 12 jurors, two found the prince insane, while 10 found him to be sane at the time he stabbed Polonius, adviser to the king in the classic Shakespeare play.

Noted Los Angeles attorneys filled in as prosecutors and defense lawyers before an audience of other lawyers, students and one-time Hamlet actor Mel Gibson.

"It has taken well over 400 years for our client to get his day in court," said Blair Berk, who represented Hamlet. "To be sane, or not to be sane, at the time he killed Polonius. That is the question."

Berk and the other defense attorney, Richard Hirsch, played on Shakespeare's words in arguing that Hamlet had a classic personality disorder.

"He was truly a melancholy Dane," said Hirsch, noting that Hamlet's own mother proclaimed him to be mad.

But the prosecutors, Deputy District Attorney Danette Meyers and lawyer Nathan Hochman, argued that Hamlet was sane - though obsessed with avenging the death of his father.

Meyers told the jury that Hamlet's murderous behavior was not a result of insanity. "This is anger, and what today would be called payback," she said.

She also said his vision of his father as a ghost giving him orders was not evidence of his mental state. "Seeing ghosts was not uncommon in the state of Denmark," she told the "court."

Both sides called to the witness stand famed forensic psychiatrists who have testified in high-profile cases including those of O.J. Simpson, Charles Manson and the Unabomber.

Dr Saul Faerstein said Hamlet was "totally crazed and unhinged," citing soliloquies in which "he's talking to himself with no one else there."

He said what Hamlet "was experiencing was an auditory hallucination" when he saw his father's ghost.

"That was a sign of a significant psychological disorder," Faerstein said.

Dr Ronald Markman disagreed, saying Hamlet knew right from wrong and did not meet the current accepted criteria for having a major depressive disorder. "My opinion is, he was sane-based on his behavior before, after and during the act."

On cross-examination, Hirsch asked the medical expert how much he was paid for his testimony.

"I got free parking and a very tasty sandwich," Markman deadpanned.

After the hung jury could not reach a decision, the judge sentenced Hamlet to "the pages of our literary heritage to challenge us and later generations to know more about you."




 

Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.

沪公网安备 31010602000204号

Email this to your friend