Swiss voters reject ‘money for nothing’ plan
Print Edition
SWISS voters yesterday rejected, by a wide margin, a proposal to introduce a guaranteed basic income for everyone living in the country after an uneasy debate about the future of work at a time of increasing automation.
Supporters had said introducing a monthly income of 2,500 Swiss francs (US$2,563) per adult and 625 francs per child under 18 no matter how much they work would promote human dignity and public service.
Opponents, including the government, said it would cost too much and weaken the economy.
Projections by the GFS polling outfit for Swiss broadcaster SRF showed nearly four out of five voters opposed the bold social experiment launched by Basel cafe owner Daniel Haeni and allies in a vote under the Swiss system of direct democracy. Haeni acknowledged defeat but claimed a moral victory.
“As a businessman I am a realist and had reckoned with 15 percent support, now it looks like more than 20 percent or maybe even 25 percent. I find that fabulous and sensational,” he told SRF.
“When I see the media interest, from abroad as well, then I say we are setting a trend.”
Switzerland is the first country to hold a national referendum on an unconditional basic income, but others, including Finland, are examining similar plans as societies ponder a world in which robots replace humans in the workforce.
Olivier, a 26-year-old carpenter who works on construction sites and runs a small business where he designs and builds furniture, said he voted “yes” to the initiative.
“For me it would be a great opportunity to put my focus on my passion and not go to work just for a living,” he said.
Champions of the plan have painted just such a future in a poster bigger than a soccer field asking: “What would you do if your income was secure?”
They also marched as robots down Zurich’s main street and handed out free 10-franc notes.
A man who gave his name as Stephan said he supported the idea as a “sustainable solution for society.”
“I think people will go on working because it is a human need to be useful, to do meaningful action. In fact, I have the impression that people would be even more productive if they are productive by themselves instead of being obliged to be productive,” he said.
A woman named Meleanie said she reluctantly voted “no.”
“I find that it is a real danger that once people just get their basic needs covered society doesn’t feel responsible anymore to look after the ones who can’t really handle the situation on their own,” she said.
Employers also heaved a sigh of relief that Switzerland, where unemployment is only around 3.5 percent, had not become the first country to embrace such a groundbreaking measure.
The government urged voters to reject the campaign, saying it would cost too much and undermine society.
The plan, which included replacing in full or in part what people got from social benefits, would have cost 208 billion Swiss francs a year, the government estimated, significantly weakened the economy and discouraged people, especially low earners, from working, it said.
Much of the cost could have been covered by existing social security payments, but sharp spending cuts or tax increases would have had to make up a remaining 25-billion gap.
An advanced social safety net already supports people who cannot pay for themselves for their livelihood. Fewer than seven percent of people lived in poverty in 2014, official data show.
In a separate vote, voters also rejected a proposal to require state-controlled companies not to seek to make a profit.
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 沪ICP证：沪ICP备05050403号-1
- |
- 互联网新闻信息服务许可证：31120180004
- |
- 网络视听许可证：0909346
- |
- 广播电视节目制作许可证：沪字第354号
- |
- 增值电信业务经营许可证：沪B2-20120012
Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
