Related News
Tough job for Yale murder defense
Source: Agencies |
September 21, 2009, Monday
|
Print Edition
Print Edition
DEFENDING a Yale lab technician charged with murder against what appears to be a mountain of forensic evidence might mean trying to convince jurors the crime scene was contaminated because police didn't immediately shut down the lab where the victim was found, legal experts said.
Raymond Clark III, 24, is charged with murder for the death of Yale graduate student Annie Le. She vanished from a research building in Yale's medical school complex on September 8; her body was found hidden in a wall recess five days later, on what was to be her wedding day.
Police charged Clark after reviewing 300 pieces of evidence. Officials reportedly found DNA from Le and Clark in the recess where Le's body was found.
The evidence is so overwhelming that police believe they don't necessarily have to uncover Clark's motive for the killing to convince jurors of his guilt.
That likely leaves Clark's attorneys with going after how that evidence was gathered - rather than what it showed - and have prosecutors defend their decision not to seal the lab building until Le's body was found.
Yale students were allowed into the basement of the research building for at least three days after Le disappeared. Clark was in the lab cleaning while police were conducting interviews shortly after the grad student disappeared, and tried to hide lab cleaning equipment they later discovered contained blood spatters.
Raymond Clark III, 24, is charged with murder for the death of Yale graduate student Annie Le. She vanished from a research building in Yale's medical school complex on September 8; her body was found hidden in a wall recess five days later, on what was to be her wedding day.
Police charged Clark after reviewing 300 pieces of evidence. Officials reportedly found DNA from Le and Clark in the recess where Le's body was found.
The evidence is so overwhelming that police believe they don't necessarily have to uncover Clark's motive for the killing to convince jurors of his guilt.
That likely leaves Clark's attorneys with going after how that evidence was gathered - rather than what it showed - and have prosecutors defend their decision not to seal the lab building until Le's body was found.
Yale students were allowed into the basement of the research building for at least three days after Le disappeared. Clark was in the lab cleaning while police were conducting interviews shortly after the grad student disappeared, and tried to hide lab cleaning equipment they later discovered contained blood spatters.
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 娌狪CP璇侊細娌狪CP澶05050403鍙-1
- |
- 浜掕仈缃戞柊闂讳俊鎭湇鍔¤鍙瘉锛31120180004
- |
- 缃戠粶瑙嗗惉璁稿彲璇侊細0909346
- |
- 骞挎挱鐢佃鑺傜洰鍒朵綔璁稿彲璇侊細娌瓧绗354鍙
- |
- 澧炲肩數淇′笟鍔＄粡钀ヨ鍙瘉锛氭勃B2-20120012
Copyright 漏 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
