The story appears on

Page A3

September 6, 2013

GET this page in PDF

Free for subscribers

View shopping cart

Related News

HomeWorld

US Navy chief plays down cost of action

The cost of possible military strikes against Syria would not be “extraordinary,” the US Navy chief said yesterday, downplaying the potential price tag of the operation.

Admiral Jonathan Greenert’s comments appeared to confirm a rough estimate from Pentagon chief Chuck Hagel on Wednesday, who told lawmakers the punitive strikes would likely cost “tens of millions” of dollars.

Naval ships and submarines equipped with Tomahawk cruise missiles are expected to play the primary role in punitive strikes proposed by President Barack Obama, who has asked Congress to back intervention to punish Damascus over the alleged use of chemical weapons.

In outlining the funds required, Greenert said that a single Tomahawk missile costs US$1.5 million and that keeping some ships in the area would costs millions more.

“The numbers are nagging but they’re not extraordinary at this point,” Greenert said at an event organized by the American Enterprise Institute think tank.

The navy currently has four destroyers in the Mediterranean ready if called upon as well as the aircraft carrier Nimitz and accompanying warships in the Red Sea.

“Many of these ships were going to be out there anyway,” Greenert said.

“In the case of the Nimitz, she was to be headed home,” he said. “So if we extend her much beyond say a week or so, she starts going in that theater longer than what we had planned.”

He said a carrier strike group costs up to US$40 million a week if its aircraft are engaged in special combat-related flights, as opposed to routine operations that cost US$25 million a week.

It was the first time a senior US military officer had openly acknowledged the Obama administration was considering using Tomahawk missiles in a strike against Syria, though officials had privately leaked that possibility previously.

The ships deployed in the region “are fully ready for a vast spectrum of operations, including operations that they may be asked to do, from launching Tomahawk missiles to protecting ... the ships themselves,” he said.

The admiral described Tomahawks as an effective weapon that provided “a really good option” for commanders.

The Pentagon’s estimates were apparently based on the assumption that any intervention would last no longer than a few days.

 


 

Copyright 漏 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.

娌叕缃戝畨澶 31010602000204鍙

Email this to your friend