US high court raises doubts on gay marriage case
Source: Agencies |
March 27, 2013, Wednesday
|
Print Edition
Print Edition
AS the US Supreme Court heard arguments yesterday on the delicate and divisive issue of gay marriage, Chief Justice John Roberts expressed doubt that California opponents of gay marriage had a right to be heard in federal court.
US citizens in general do not have a right to sue to enforce laws they favor. Roberts pressed lawyer Charles Cooper, who represents gay marriage opponents, on why his clients are any different as they seek to enforce California's gay marriage ban, known as Proposition 8.
"I don't think we've ever allowed anything like that," Roberts said in the first half of an hour of scheduled argument.
If Cooper's clients lack the right to appear, known as standing, the Supreme Court may not reach the central question of gay marriage rights.
Justice Anthony Kennedy, who like Roberts is seen as a potential swing vote, pressed Cooper.
Kennedy used one of his questions to focus on the "imminent legal injury" facing 40,000 California children being raised by gay and lesbian couples.
"They want their parents to have full recognition and full status," he said.
Cooper, facing a barrage of questions mostly from the Supreme Court's liberal wing, called California's law the equivalent of a "pause button."
A ruling that finds a fundamental right to marry for gays and lesbians would unfairly cut off spirited public debate nationwide, Cooper said.
As demonstrators from both sides gathered peacefully in front of the Supreme Court building on a brisk morning in Washington, the first of two days of oral arguments on the issue got under way inside.
Today, the court will consider the 1996 federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which limits the definition of marriage to opposite-sex couples. Rulings in both cases are expected by the end of June.
Over the two days of arguments, the justices will have their say on what gay activists see as a civil rights issue reminiscent of famous Supreme Court cases of the past, including Loving v. Virginia, a 1967 case in which the court invalidated bans on interracial marriage.
The cases come before the high court at a time when nine states plus the District of Columbia have legalized gay marriage.
"Never before in our history has a major civil rights issue landed on the doorstep of the Supreme Court with this wave of public support," said Theodore Boutrous, a lawyer for opponents of Proposition 8.
US citizens in general do not have a right to sue to enforce laws they favor. Roberts pressed lawyer Charles Cooper, who represents gay marriage opponents, on why his clients are any different as they seek to enforce California's gay marriage ban, known as Proposition 8.
"I don't think we've ever allowed anything like that," Roberts said in the first half of an hour of scheduled argument.
If Cooper's clients lack the right to appear, known as standing, the Supreme Court may not reach the central question of gay marriage rights.
Justice Anthony Kennedy, who like Roberts is seen as a potential swing vote, pressed Cooper.
Kennedy used one of his questions to focus on the "imminent legal injury" facing 40,000 California children being raised by gay and lesbian couples.
"They want their parents to have full recognition and full status," he said.
Cooper, facing a barrage of questions mostly from the Supreme Court's liberal wing, called California's law the equivalent of a "pause button."
A ruling that finds a fundamental right to marry for gays and lesbians would unfairly cut off spirited public debate nationwide, Cooper said.
As demonstrators from both sides gathered peacefully in front of the Supreme Court building on a brisk morning in Washington, the first of two days of oral arguments on the issue got under way inside.
Today, the court will consider the 1996 federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which limits the definition of marriage to opposite-sex couples. Rulings in both cases are expected by the end of June.
Over the two days of arguments, the justices will have their say on what gay activists see as a civil rights issue reminiscent of famous Supreme Court cases of the past, including Loving v. Virginia, a 1967 case in which the court invalidated bans on interracial marriage.
The cases come before the high court at a time when nine states plus the District of Columbia have legalized gay marriage.
"Never before in our history has a major civil rights issue landed on the doorstep of the Supreme Court with this wave of public support," said Theodore Boutrous, a lawyer for opponents of Proposition 8.
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 沪ICP证：沪ICP备05050403号-1
- |
- 互联网新闻信息服务许可证：31120180004
- |
- 网络视听许可证：0909346
- |
- 广播电视节目制作许可证：沪字第354号
- |
- 增值电信业务经营许可证：沪B2-20120012
Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
