US pilots file screening lawsuit
Source: Agencies |
March 20, 2011, Sunday
|
Print Edition
Print Edition
TWO US commercial airline pilots complained in a lawsuit on Friday that new screening procedures for flight crews - scaled back after complaints by pilots - were still too invasive and violated privacy rights.
The US Transportation Security Administration on October 19 started requiring air travelers and flight crews to go through full-body scans or physical patdowns amid concerns that militants could hide a bomb underneath their clothing and detonate it aboard a plane.
Pilots and flight crews complained the new screening exposed them to excessive radiation because they fly so frequently.
On November 13 the Transportation Security Administration revised the procedures for the crews but two pilots filed a lawsuit challenging the new screening procedures under the US Constitution's Fourth Amendment, which limits unreasonable searches and seizures.
The new procedures require pilots to go through only metal detectors and if an alarm goes off, they would be subjected to escalating levels of physical patdowns, according to a revised lawsuit the pilots filed on Friday.
United Continental pilot Ann Poe called the patdown in the lawsuit equivalent to a "physical molestation."
Poe has an artificial hip and told the court that as a result she would always set off the metal detector and thus subject to an enhanced patdown. She refused to go through the new screening procedures on November 4 and has not flown since that incident, the lawsuit said.
Michael Roberts, a pilot for ExpressJet Airlines, joined her in the lawsuit and had stopped working when the new screening measures were adopted. He has since resumed flying, the lawsuit said.
The US Transportation Security Administration on October 19 started requiring air travelers and flight crews to go through full-body scans or physical patdowns amid concerns that militants could hide a bomb underneath their clothing and detonate it aboard a plane.
Pilots and flight crews complained the new screening exposed them to excessive radiation because they fly so frequently.
On November 13 the Transportation Security Administration revised the procedures for the crews but two pilots filed a lawsuit challenging the new screening procedures under the US Constitution's Fourth Amendment, which limits unreasonable searches and seizures.
The new procedures require pilots to go through only metal detectors and if an alarm goes off, they would be subjected to escalating levels of physical patdowns, according to a revised lawsuit the pilots filed on Friday.
United Continental pilot Ann Poe called the patdown in the lawsuit equivalent to a "physical molestation."
Poe has an artificial hip and told the court that as a result she would always set off the metal detector and thus subject to an enhanced patdown. She refused to go through the new screening procedures on November 4 and has not flown since that incident, the lawsuit said.
Michael Roberts, a pilot for ExpressJet Airlines, joined her in the lawsuit and had stopped working when the new screening measures were adopted. He has since resumed flying, the lawsuit said.
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 沪ICP证：沪ICP备05050403号-1
- |
- 互联网新闻信息服务许可证：31120180004
- |
- 网络视听许可证：0909346
- |
- 广播电视节目制作许可证：沪字第354号
- |
- 增值电信业务经营许可证：沪B2-20120012
Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
