Wilders' wild views on Islam 'not factual'
Source: Agencies |
October 13, 2010, Wednesday
|
Print Edition
Print Edition
POPULIST politician Geert Wilders' negative views of Islam - he has called it "retarded" and "inherently violent" - are his opinions, not irrefutable facts, Dutch prosecutors argued yesterday at his criminal trial for inciting hatred in Amsterdam.
Wilders has argued that his views of Islam are supported by expert and academic analysis, and speaking the truth cannot be a crime. He says the charges against him are an attack on the freedom of speech.
But at the second hearing of his closely watched trial, prosecutors countered that there is no general agreement about the nature of Islam, and Wilders' statements are opinions that cross the legal threshold.
Prosecutors, however, dropped one charge against him, that of insulting a group on the basis of its religion, noting his statements have been mostly directed toward Islam as an ideology, rather than Muslims.
He is still charged with inciting hatred and discrimination against Muslims.
Under Dutch law, it is illegal to insult or incite hatred against a group of people on the basis of gender, religion, race or sexuality.
"What he puts forward is, and remains, his individual opinion, and just like with any expression of opinion, we can test whether it falls under the right to freedom of expression or whether it is a transgression of the criminal code," said prosecutor Birgit van Roessel.
The case against Wilders is based on dozens of public statements. Typical among them were views he published in an opinion piece in the national newspaper De Volkskrant.
"I've had enough of Islam in the Netherlands; let not one more Muslim immigrate," he wrote. "I've had enough of the Quran in the Netherlands: Forbid that fascist book."
As recently as August he repeated his view, rejected by Muslims, that Islam is inherently violent and backward.
Popular politician
Wilders, who polls suggest is the Netherlands' most popular politician, denies wrongdoing. He says his opinions are protected by freedom of speech and endorsed by more than a million people who voted for him in national elections last June.
Without addressing any of Wilders' specific remarks, van Roessel said freedom of speech has limits.
"You can expect a politician to be aware of the impact of his words and in any case, the legal limit may not be crossed, no matter how important it may be to address supposed problems and to contribute to matters of general interest."
Prosecutors had initially declined to act on complaints and press charges against Wilders at all. But an appeals court ruled there was sufficient evidence he has broken the law, and ordered them to bring a case.
They will make their sentencing demand, if any, at the next hearing on Friday. The defense is due to present its case next week, with a verdict expected on November 5.
Wilders has argued that his views of Islam are supported by expert and academic analysis, and speaking the truth cannot be a crime. He says the charges against him are an attack on the freedom of speech.
But at the second hearing of his closely watched trial, prosecutors countered that there is no general agreement about the nature of Islam, and Wilders' statements are opinions that cross the legal threshold.
Prosecutors, however, dropped one charge against him, that of insulting a group on the basis of its religion, noting his statements have been mostly directed toward Islam as an ideology, rather than Muslims.
He is still charged with inciting hatred and discrimination against Muslims.
Under Dutch law, it is illegal to insult or incite hatred against a group of people on the basis of gender, religion, race or sexuality.
"What he puts forward is, and remains, his individual opinion, and just like with any expression of opinion, we can test whether it falls under the right to freedom of expression or whether it is a transgression of the criminal code," said prosecutor Birgit van Roessel.
The case against Wilders is based on dozens of public statements. Typical among them were views he published in an opinion piece in the national newspaper De Volkskrant.
"I've had enough of Islam in the Netherlands; let not one more Muslim immigrate," he wrote. "I've had enough of the Quran in the Netherlands: Forbid that fascist book."
As recently as August he repeated his view, rejected by Muslims, that Islam is inherently violent and backward.
Popular politician
Wilders, who polls suggest is the Netherlands' most popular politician, denies wrongdoing. He says his opinions are protected by freedom of speech and endorsed by more than a million people who voted for him in national elections last June.
Without addressing any of Wilders' specific remarks, van Roessel said freedom of speech has limits.
"You can expect a politician to be aware of the impact of his words and in any case, the legal limit may not be crossed, no matter how important it may be to address supposed problems and to contribute to matters of general interest."
Prosecutors had initially declined to act on complaints and press charges against Wilders at all. But an appeals court ruled there was sufficient evidence he has broken the law, and ordered them to bring a case.
They will make their sentencing demand, if any, at the next hearing on Friday. The defense is due to present its case next week, with a verdict expected on November 5.
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 沪ICP证：沪ICP备05050403号-1
- |
- 互联网新闻信息服务许可证：31120180004
- |
- 网络视听许可证：0909346
- |
- 广播电视节目制作许可证：沪字第354号
- |
- 增值电信业务经营许可证：沪B2-20120012
Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
