Related News
Tokyo, IOC dismiss costs report
Print Edition
The chief executive officer of the Tokyo Olympics and the IOC member in charge of Japan鈥檚 Games have dismissed a new study from the University of Oxford that finds Tokyo is the most expensive Summer Games since 1960.
Tokyo, postponed to 2021 because of the coronavirus pandemic, is only a small part of economist Bent Flyvbjerg鈥檚 study which was published yesterday and titled, 鈥淩egression to the Tail: Why the Olympics Blow Up.鈥
The analysis in the journal 鈥淓nvironment and Planning A: Economy and Space鈥 鈥 the third in a series following editions 2012 and 2016 鈥 looks at Olympic costs and finds they keep increasing despite claims by the International Olympic Committee that costs are being cut.
Cost overruns for the Olympics have averaged 170 percent, and Flyvbjerg says Tokyo is over 200 percent.
鈥淲ell, I am aware of the report in the media. But there was no official statement given to the Tokyo organizing committee,鈥 Tokyo CEO Toshiro Muto said yesterday in an online news conference. 鈥淪o I am not in a position to make any comment on that. I am just simply confused.鈥
IOC Vice President John Coates, who oversees planning for Tokyo, also brushed aside the Oxford study.
鈥淚鈥檝e taken the view that I鈥檝e got more productive things to do with my time than to analyze that report and respond to it,鈥 Coates told the Australian Financial Review newspaper yesterday.
Flyvbjerg got a similar response from the IOC when the report came out unofficially a few days ago. The IOC criticized his work, questioned the numbers and methodology. In response, Flyvbjerg sent an open letter to IOC President Thomas Bach, offering details.
Flyvbjerg said yesterday the IOC had not replied. On Monday, the IOC said it would have no further comment.
According to the Oxford numbers, Tokyo鈥檚 spending is at US$15.84 billion, already surpassing the 2012 London Olympics, which were the most expensive Summer Games to date at US$14.95 billion. Flyvbjerg says the meter is still running and expects several billion more to be added to the cost.
Tokyo organizers say officially they are spending US$12.6 billion. However, a national auditor says the actual costs are twice that high, made up of some expenses that the Oxford study omits because they are not constant between different Olympics.
鈥淭he Olympics offer the highest level of risk a city can take on,鈥 Flyvbjerg said in an interview this month. 鈥淭he trend cannot continue. No city will want to do this because it鈥檚 just too expensive, putting themselves into a debt that most cities cannot afford.鈥
Flyvbjerg says the basic problem is the IOC does not pay for most of the Olympics, or the cost overruns. He suggested the IOC should pay at least 10 percent or cost overruns, and probably much more.
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 娌狪CP璇侊細娌狪CP澶05050403鍙-1
- |
- 浜掕仈缃戞柊闂讳俊鎭湇鍔¤鍙瘉锛31120180004
- |
- 缃戠粶瑙嗗惉璁稿彲璇侊細0909346
- |
- 骞挎挱鐢佃鑺傜洰鍒朵綔璁稿彲璇侊細娌瓧绗354鍙
- |
- 澧炲肩數淇′笟鍔＄粡钀ヨ鍙瘉锛氭勃B2-20120012
Copyright 漏 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
