Reds, United created splits but hasten action on league revamp
Print Edition
Vilified by the English Premier League, government, and even their own supporters, the American owners of Liverpool and Manchester United created a power-grab strategy that appeared unsavory and divisive at a time of financial turmoil in English soccer.
But John Henry and Joel Glazer formed a plan, however unappealing to so many, for shoehorning a consolidation of EPL control for the elite into a long-term bailout for the lower professional leagues.
Seven months into the pandemic that has locked fans out of English stadiums 鈥 and deprived clubs of key income 鈥 it is more than the world鈥檚 richest league has managed. Only now is the EPL getting its act together after getting its clubs to reject Project Big Picture, which was made public on Sunday by the head of the lower leagues working in cahoots with Glazer and Henry.
There鈥檚 a scramble to come up with a blueprint by Richard Masters, whose limited authority has been exposed in his first year as chief executive of a league where the clubs are ultimately in control. 鈥淲hat I think we鈥檙e trying to do,鈥 he said of his own Project Big Picture, 鈥渋s do the main components by the end of the year.鈥
That might be too late for the third and fourth tiers overseen by the English Football League.
鈥淚t is desperate,鈥 Ian Mather, chief executive of fourth-tier side Cambridge United, told Sky News. 鈥淭here are clubs that are going to go out of business unless we get a deal and we get a deal soon.鈥
The uncertainty hasn鈥檛 prevented Cambridge following Liverpool and United in attracting American investment, with two businessmen last month buying a 20 percent stake in the club 鈥 showing the appeal of lower-league clubs.
The EPL has cut the second-tier Championship out of any financial rescue for now, offering grants and interest-free loans totaling 50 million pounds (US$65 million) for clubs in League One and Two in addition to 27.2 million pounds in solidarity payments already made this year.
The EPL鈥檚 reticence to rush into handing over cash to the lower leagues is understandable when its own financial difficulties were apparent even before the pandemic. Also, Cambridge reported losses of more than 800,000 pounds annually in recent years 鈥 after spending on salaries more than it generates.
Project Big Picture envisaged handing out more than 25 percent of EPL central revenue 鈥 minus operating costs and good causes contributions. But while allowing the six biggest clubs to effectively seize control with preferential voting and widening the gulf in the EPL by changing the formula for distributing TV cash. The size of the EPL would also have been reduced from 20 to 18 teams that would free up space in the calendar to play more games against European sides.
Intriguingly, Masters is open to reducing the number of teams in the EPL, which began as a breakaway from the EFL with 22 in 1992 before shedding two in 1995. 鈥淧art of the review will be the size and shape of the Premier League and the pyramid itself,鈥 Masters said. 鈥淲e鈥檝e got a clear path forward and uncertainty is very dangerous, and I think we鈥檙e resolved the uncertainty.鈥
For now. But the plight of teams in the lower leagues remains uncertain as coronavirus cases rise and new local restrictions dampen the prospect of stadiums reopening to supporters.
鈥淲e have to find a way that works for everybody,鈥 said Mikel Arteta, manager of Arsenal, which is owned by American tycoon Stan Kroenke, 鈥渢hat can make this game sustainable and still evolve.鈥
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 娌狪CP璇侊細娌狪CP澶05050403鍙-1
- |
- 浜掕仈缃戞柊闂讳俊鎭湇鍔¤鍙瘉锛31120180004
- |
- 缃戠粶瑙嗗惉璁稿彲璇侊細0909346
- |
- 骞挎挱鐢佃鑺傜洰鍒朵綔璁稿彲璇侊細娌瓧绗354鍙
- |
- 澧炲肩數淇′笟鍔＄粡钀ヨ鍙瘉锛氭勃B2-20120012
Copyright 漏 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
